Re: [fw-wiz] Disecting the Cisco PIX
From: Evan Wagner (ewagner@Radix.Net)
Date: 07/30/02
- Next message: Michael C. Ibarra: "Re: [fw-wiz] Disecting the Cisco PIX"
- Previous message: Brian Ford: "RE: [fw-wiz] PIX vs Checkpoint vs Sonicwall vs Netscreen - comments?"
- In reply to: Art Mason: "[fw-wiz] Disecting the Cisco PIX"
- Next in thread: Michael C. Ibarra: "Re: [fw-wiz] Disecting the Cisco PIX"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Evan Wagner <ewagner@Radix.Net> To: Art Mason <a.c.mason@sbcglobal.net> Date: Tue Jul 30 15:34:02 2002
Yes,
A PIX 520 consists of an Intel Seattle II motherboard, power supply, floppy
drive, proprietary Cisco ISA flash card and 2 or more Intel Pro 100 PCI
NICs. That's all the components needed to create a 'FrankenPIX'. There was
a thread on Usenet about this a while back...
PIX classics may have used 10MB NICs but not the 520's that I am aware of.
--Evan
On 30 Jul 2002, Art Mason wrote:
> Out of curiosity, has anyone here ever cracked open any of the Cisco PIX
> series firewalls chassis? From what I've gathered by reading up on
> their product information and by what people have said about them in
> various mailing lists and newsgroups, they are actually built on an x86
> hardware platform w/ a Celeron 300MHz (PIX 506E) to Pentium III 1.0GHz
> (PIX 535) CPU and anywhere from 32MB to 1GB RAM . I understand the
> storage media to be compact flash (4-16MB capacity) and on the low-end
> models w/ 10Mb throughput, they actually use an ISA NIC in the chassis.
> I've also read that the PIX doesn't support local logging (everything
> needs to be redirected to a syslog server). Can anyone confirm any of
> this? If so, why couldn't one just throw OpenBSD onto some flash media,
> drop a couple of Intel Pro100+ dual-port NICs in a 2U rackmount case,
> maybe offload some of the VPN stuff onto an ASIC-based encryption
> acceleration card, and save some big bucks, granted they know how to set
> up PF from the CLI? This is just something I've been wondering about
> for a while, and was curious as to what others in the know had to say
> about it. Thanks in advance.
>
> Art Mason
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> firewall-wizards mailing list
> firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
> http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
>
- Next message: Michael C. Ibarra: "Re: [fw-wiz] Disecting the Cisco PIX"
- Previous message: Brian Ford: "RE: [fw-wiz] PIX vs Checkpoint vs Sonicwall vs Netscreen - comments?"
- In reply to: Art Mason: "[fw-wiz] Disecting the Cisco PIX"
- Next in thread: Michael C. Ibarra: "Re: [fw-wiz] Disecting the Cisco PIX"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|