Re: [fw-wiz] PIX vs Checkpoint vs Sonicwall vs Netscreen - comments?
From: Stephane Nasdrovisky (stephane.nasdrovisky@uniway.be)
Date: 07/27/02
- Next message: John Adams: "Re: [fw-wiz] PIX vs Checkpoint vs Sonicwall vs Netscreen - comments?"
- Previous message: Dave Mitchell: "Re: [fw-wiz] PIX vs Checkpoint vs Sonicwall vs Netscreen - comments?"
- In reply to: John Adams: "Re: [fw-wiz] PIX vs Checkpoint vs Sonicwall vs Netscreen - comments?"
- Next in thread: John Adams: "Re: [fw-wiz] PIX vs Checkpoint vs Sonicwall vs Netscreen - comments?"
- Reply: John Adams: "Re: [fw-wiz] PIX vs Checkpoint vs Sonicwall vs Netscreen - comments?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Stephane Nasdrovisky" <stephane.nasdrovisky@uniway.be> To: security-basics@securityfocus.com Date: Sat Jul 27 13:32:21 2002
Unfortunatly, it's hard to believe the nokia IP120 is working well. There are
complaints on the phoneboy's fw1-wizard mailinglist about this device. It may
work with older version of the software but should be avoided for the latest
firewall-1 version. It is especially true if you want some 'advance' features
such as vpn.
In one word, the nokia IP120 is a no go for professionals that do not want
nightmares.
> Have you considered the Nokia IP120's running Checkpoint? They work
> extremely well for branch offices, and you can admin all of the policies
> from one place using the checkpoint management server.
>
- Next message: John Adams: "Re: [fw-wiz] PIX vs Checkpoint vs Sonicwall vs Netscreen - comments?"
- Previous message: Dave Mitchell: "Re: [fw-wiz] PIX vs Checkpoint vs Sonicwall vs Netscreen - comments?"
- In reply to: John Adams: "Re: [fw-wiz] PIX vs Checkpoint vs Sonicwall vs Netscreen - comments?"
- Next in thread: John Adams: "Re: [fw-wiz] PIX vs Checkpoint vs Sonicwall vs Netscreen - comments?"
- Reply: John Adams: "Re: [fw-wiz] PIX vs Checkpoint vs Sonicwall vs Netscreen - comments?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]