Re: [fw-wiz] FWTK and smap/smapd
From: Roger Marquis (marquis@roble.com)
Date: 07/17/02
- Next message: Scott Walker Register: "Re: [fw-wiz] CP FW1 802.1q"
- Previous message: Bennett Todd: "Re: [fw-wiz] FWTK and smap/smapd"
- Maybe in reply to: Behm, Jeffrey L.: "[fw-wiz] FWTK and smap/smapd"
- Next in thread: Brian Hatch: "Re: [fw-wiz] FWTK and smap/smapd"
- Reply: Brian Hatch: "Re: [fw-wiz] FWTK and smap/smapd"
- Reply: Dominik Miklaszewski: "Re: [fw-wiz] FWTK and smap/smapd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com> To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com Date: Wed Jul 17 16:53:01 2002
Rick Murphy wrote:
>Like? Examples, lots of them (or at least one).
>
>OK.
>Much of the spam I used to receive came from forged hotmail.com accounts.
>Very little spam actually comes from hotmail, so I don't want to just block
>them since there are some legitimate correspondents of mine that use their
>mail (heck, I use a hotmail address sometimes when I'm on the road..)
Ron Guilmette has patches that do this for Postfix at
<http://www.monkeys.com/anti-spam/filtering/additions.html>. I
tried them but had too many false positives, even for the commonly
forged domains like hotmail. They did catch some spam though it
never more than 2 or 3% of the daily filtered total.
-- Roger Marquis Roble Systems Consulting http://www.roble.com/
- Next message: Scott Walker Register: "Re: [fw-wiz] CP FW1 802.1q"
- Previous message: Bennett Todd: "Re: [fw-wiz] FWTK and smap/smapd"
- Maybe in reply to: Behm, Jeffrey L.: "[fw-wiz] FWTK and smap/smapd"
- Next in thread: Brian Hatch: "Re: [fw-wiz] FWTK and smap/smapd"
- Reply: Brian Hatch: "Re: [fw-wiz] FWTK and smap/smapd"
- Reply: Dominik Miklaszewski: "Re: [fw-wiz] FWTK and smap/smapd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
