Re: [fw-wiz] strong passwords
From: miha@nil.si
Date: 07/09/02
- Next message: Behm, Jeffrey L.: "RE: [fw-wiz] strong passwords (was Radius/MS ISA stuff)"
- Previous message: George W. Capehart: "Re: [fw-wiz] strong passwords (was Radius/MS ISA stuff)"
- Next in thread: Mikael Olsson: "Re: [fw-wiz] strong passwords"
- Reply: Mikael Olsson: "Re: [fw-wiz] strong passwords"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Barney Wolff <barney@tp.databus.com> From: miha@nil.si Date: Tue Jul 9 12:31:00 2002
Barney Wolff wrote:
>You're looking at the wrong number. The Birthday Paradox means that
>*if you have 2^64 things* you've got about a 50:50 chance of finding two
>that hash to the same value. But you still have to look at about
>2^127 things to find one with a hash equal to a desired one. You're
>much wiser to attack the password itself than MD5.
Now, I don't have my copy of Applied Cryptography ready, but isn't 50:50
chance much too high? If I remember correctly it is more in the lines of:
birthday attacks are possible, just not very likely, but finding something
that hashes to the same value as a specific text/password is next to
impossible ( very hard ).
Yes/No/Maybe?
--- Miha Vitorovic
- Next message: Behm, Jeffrey L.: "RE: [fw-wiz] strong passwords (was Radius/MS ISA stuff)"
- Previous message: George W. Capehart: "Re: [fw-wiz] strong passwords (was Radius/MS ISA stuff)"
- Next in thread: Mikael Olsson: "Re: [fw-wiz] strong passwords"
- Reply: Mikael Olsson: "Re: [fw-wiz] strong passwords"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|